Every two years, half of the state senators and all of the members of the state House are up for election. To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority vote is required in both the Iowa State Senate and the Iowa House of Representatives in two legislative sessions with an election for state legislators in between. How did this amendment get on the ballot? See also: Path to the ballot Most states with some form of Second Amendment do NOT include 'strict scrutiny' language." The Iowans for Responsible Gun Laws PAC raised $31,073 to oppose the amendments with top donors including Iowans for Gun Safety, Iowans for Gun Safety board member Janet Rosenbury, the American Association of University Women of Iowa, Lloyd-Jones Trust Agency, and Sisters of St Francis. Iowans for Gun Safety said, "The 'strict scrutiny' language is an overreach that could threaten future sensible gun safety legislation and possibly lead to costly court challenges of current laws and future legislative efforts to address gun violence by placing a higher standard on cases (as has already happened to state and local government agencies in Louisiana and Missouri.) Arguments from gun groups at the Iowa Capitol have centered on the 'rights' of gun-owning citizens over and against the safety of the public in general. Iowans for Responsible Gun Laws opposed amendment. ![]() If they do not fit that category, they will not be safe and they should not be on the books." Steven Holt (R) said, "The right to someone’s own life and the pursuit of their own happiness, their own destiny - life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness - cannot be separated from the right to defend their life, hence the fundamental right to keep and bear arms in our Second Amendment." Regarding the strict scrutiny provision, Holt said, "If current or future laws are narrowly tailored to advance a compelling government interest regarding this fundamental individual right, they will be safe. If such were to occur, the presence of the Freedom Amendment in Iowa's Constitution would preserve strong protection of those rights at the state level." Amendment sponsor Rep. There is (a) significant political element that wishes to either reinterpret the contemporary understanding of the meaning of the Second Amendment through overturning Supreme Court precedent - by packing the court if necessary - or by amending or repealing the amendment itself. Although it is the ultimate guarantor of our other rights, Iowa is one of only six states that do not protect that vital right in their constitutions. courts have long recognized that the right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right that preexisted the Constitution and which is protected - not granted - by the Second Amendment. The Iowa Firearms Coalition supported the amendment. Who was behind the campaigns surrounding this measure? See also: Campaign finance, Support, and Opposition Do other states have a constitutional right to bear arms? See also BackgroundĪs of 2021, 44 other states had provisions guaranteeing a right to firearms in their constitutions. ![]() The ballot measure added a right to own and bear firearms to the Iowa Constitution and require strict scrutiny for any alleged violations of the right brought before a court. Source Overview What did the amendment do? See also: Constitutional changes 9.3 Oversight in publication process voided 2018 session vote on amendments. ![]() 8.3.1 Scrutiny for constitutional firearm rights.8.1 Right to bear arms in state constitutions.2.4 How did this amendment get on the ballot?.2.3 Who was behind the campaigns surrounding this measure?.2.2 Do other states have a constitutional right to bear arms?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |